Skip to main content

"Housing's Back" or is it? Understanding Measures of Housing Affordability

By
According to the National Association of Realtors' Housing Affordability Index, 2012 was a record year for housing affordability.  The release of their results led to articles with titles such as "Housing Today Is More Affordable Than At Any Time In History" on an investment blog and "2012 a banner year for housing affordability, industry group says" in a major national newspaper. I've also seen several TV reports that covered how affordable housing has become. If that's the case, then how could we release a paper titled "Loss of Housing Affordability Threatens Older Middle Class Adults" as part of AARP's Middle Class Security Project?


I'm not going to focus on all of the details, but yes there are data differences: our paper focused on the 50+ middle class only, looked at a different time frame, and used different datasets than the NAR study.  More important than all of that is what we meant by "affordability."  When I investigate housing affordability, I want to know whether people can afford to stay in their homes on an ongoing basis. NAR is focused on home sales, and their index focuses on the purchase of a home. 

Our look at housing affordability focused on homeowners (and renters) who are already in their homes and may have trouble keeping those homes. These families may be dealing with stagnant incomes, increasing taxes and fees, along with higher utility bills and other costs of housing.  Affordability is not a one-time question about purchasing a home - it is an ongoing concern, each month, for a large number of families. If a healthcare emergency or another unexpected and costly event hits these families, they are increasingly in danger of not being able to pay next month’s mortgage or rent.  Simply put, many older adults (and for that matter, younger adults) are facing more unaffordable circumstances today than they were at the turn of the century. 

Groups such as the AARP Foundation have focused on housing because "many find themselves forced to choose between paying their mortgage or rent and buying groceries or medicine. Many may be able to purchase a home, but increasingly, they are in danger of not being able to keep it." Our latest AARP PPI Study shows that affordability is still a concern, despite the upbeat news from those on the production and sales side.

For more on the AARP Middle Class project, go to aarp.org/middleclass and read all of the reports at aarp.org/security. To follow tweets related to the project, search #mc50plus and follow the new AARP Public Policy Institute twitter account @AARPpolicy, and my account @DrUrbanPolicy.  But before you do all of that, share your comments below.

Labels:

Comments

  1. home inspection services louisvilleMay 29, 2013 at 10:17 AM

    Its a good thing that this group focus the housing issue. Its now easy to the family.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One?

By
Today, I kicked off AARP Public Policy Institute 's Livability Index project with a blog and two papers on new project webpage: bi.tly/LivIndex .  The PPI blog, " What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One? " introduces the project to the world. You may have wondered why I haven't been writing as much lately, and this project is what has been keeping me busy recently. In a way, this has been keeping me busy for years.
1 comment
Read more

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

By
NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girls   means that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing .”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers. For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey  (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute ) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.   The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage ap...
4 comments
Read more

Rethinking the Value of Diversity after the End of Race-Based Admissions Decisions

By
The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future.    You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four diffe...
Post a Comment
Read more