Skip to main content

Special Sneak Preview! AARP PPI Livable Communities site

Thanks for being a follower of DrUrbanPolicy!

August was a slow month for posts, in part because my AARP team has been working on a newly redesigned website for AARP's Livable Communities policies and research.

For being loyal readers of DrUrbanPolicy, I am offering you a sneak preview of the newly relaunched AARP Public Policy Institute Livable Communities Homepage - it is just finished and now on the web! Go to www.aarp.org/ppi/liv-com for policies, research and resources that can help policymakers and advocates to create communities that work for people of all ages, incomes, and physical abilities, with a special focus on improving the ability of older adults to age in place.

The official announcement comes later this week, but feel free to check it out today and let me know what you think.  Read below for a description of the new site.



The site has a home page with a description and recent publications, and three main sections:

  • POLICY 
    This section contains principles and policies that federal, state and local governments should follow in order to create livable communities, starting with general Livable Communities policies and focusing on the areas of Housing, Transportation and Land Use.
  • RESOURCES This section is the heart of the site - it connects users to all of our recent reports and publications, but also contains a TOOLKIT section which takes you outside of the Livable Communities Team.  There you will find connections to other parts of AARP, and a few non-AARP sources as well, including some of our research partners, and a few other things from around the web.  This should serve as a source of interest for many readers.
  • GET INVOLVED
    This section allows visitors to sign up for updates from the team, to request a speaker for an event, and contact information for media inquiries.
If you like the AARP site, please download a few articles, and share the links with friends and colleagues (and recommend that they do the same).  I hope that many of you find it interesting, so please leave any comments or suggestions below.

A note: Be prepared for more AARP website news and DrUrbanPolicy blog posts later this month. 

Finally: Don't forget to sign up to follow DrUrbanPolicy - social media links are on the right hand side of this page and links to subscribe to the blog are below.  If you have trouble, there are also links on the Who is DrUrbanPolicy page.  August was a slow month, but this is going to be a busy fall - don't be left behind!

 Please check back often, and thanks for reading.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One?

Today, I kicked off AARP Public Policy Institute 's Livability Index project with a blog and two papers on new project webpage: bi.tly/LivIndex .  The PPI blog, " What Is a Livable Community, and How Do We Measure One? " introduces the project to the world. You may have wondered why I haven't been writing as much lately, and this project is what has been keeping me busy recently. In a way, this has been keeping me busy for years.

The "Boom" in Golden Girls-Style Shared Housing: Where’s the Beef?

NBC, Touchstone Television and their partners should be proud– it has been 22 years since the final episode aired, yet the influence of The Golden Girls   means that every year reporters ask about the boom in “Golden Girls Housing .”  This form of shared housing receives a great amount of attention, but we'll miss the big picture if we look for big numbers. For the last few years, I have looked at data from the Current Population Survey  (analyzed by the AARP Public Policy Institute ) to count households that are all female (or all male) with at least one non-related housemate or roommate, no spouses, and no one under 50 in the home. This is the classic “Golden Girls” formula.   The result has become familiar: a very small portion of the population lives in a “golden” situation, around one percent.  The small numbers of people in those situations means that it’s hard to figure out whether it has become more popular.  Though the percentage ap...

Rethinking the Value of Diversity after the End of Race-Based Admissions Decisions

The recent Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College has sparked great discourse in the week since the decision, and in particular, fear amongst those who worry about losing a key tool to fight the legacy of discrimination and the continuing disadvantages that impact people of color in the US. In its decision, the Court’s majority ruled that admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina violated the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment. While a range of others, including Justices Jackson and Sotomayor, have laid out dissents and critiques of the decision, I have seen little discussion of the path forward for those who seek to ensure that more people from families and communities that have been impacted by racial prejudice over the nation’s history can benefit from a college education in the future.    You will read a different perspective here, building from experiences at four diffe...